- SC – IF NO ACT OF THE ACCUSED IN THE FIR IS DISCLAIMED, THE PROCEEDINGS MAY BE QUASHED. – The Supreme Court has ruled that when the complaint upon which a FIR was filed does not disclose any act of the accused or their involvement in the commission of crime, the criminal proceedings may be annulled.
RAMESH CHANDRA GUPTA VS STATE OF U.P
- SC – SUSPEND LICENSES OF ADVOCATES IN ODISHA FOR COURT BOYCOTT – The Supreme Court has requested that the Bar Council of India suspend the licenses of the attorneys who have been on strike in Odisha due to a long-standing demand for a permanent bench of the Orissa High Court in the state’s western region, at Sambalpur.
M/S PLR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED V. MAHANADI COALFIELDS LIMITED AND ORS.
- CENTER DISRUPTS JUDGES’ SENIORITY BY DIVIDING COLLEGIUM RESOLUTIONS – The Centre’s practise of approving some names from the suggestion and withholding others from Collegium Resolutions has come under fire from the Supreme Court, which noted that this approach essentially disrupts the seniority of judges.
THE ADVOCATES’ ASSOCIATION BENGALURU V. SHRI BARUN MITRA, SECRETARY (JUSTICE)
- DELHI HC REVERSES CIC ORDER REQUESTING MEA TO GIVE WIFE PASSPORT DETAILS OF ESTRANGED HUSBAND – The Delhi High Court has invalidated a decision by the Central Information Commission (CIC) that had ordered the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) to give an estranged husband’s wife information on his passport, marriage certificate, address proof, ID proof, and other related documents.
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS vs ASMITA SACHIN WAMAN
- RELIANCE RETAIL IS ORDERED BY DCDRC TO PAY RS. 7,000 AS COMPENSATION FOR COLLECTING THE CARRY BAG PRICE – Bangalore’s District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ordered Reliance Retail Limited to reimburse the complainant for the carry bag she was forced to purchase and to pay another Rs. 5000 as compensation and Rs. 2000 as court costs.
RAVIKIRAN C VS RELIANCE RETAIL LIMITED & ANR
Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this blog post is for general information and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog post should be construed as legal advice from The Aran Law Firm or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter.
