Director Duties under Section 166(5) – Company Act 2013

Legal Procedures

Action Against a Director Committed Misconduct by Committing a Breach of Duties under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act


As a director, your responsibilities are core to the success of your company. However, if you fail to uphold these duties, your company can suffer. This blog post discusses director duties and how to breach them. We’ll also look at the consequences of a breach and how to punish a bad director. So, stay informed and act responsibly to ensure the long-term growth and progress of your company!

What are the duties of a director?

It is everyone’s responsibility to act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. This means directors must protect or prevent damage to the company’s assets. Directors are also responsible for monitoring their own conduct and ensuring that they comply with provisions of the Companies Act.

If a director commits misconduct, they may face criminal charges under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act. This includes acting dishonestly, making a false statement, or engaging in other harmful behaviour.

Duties under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act

As a company director, you must prevent misconduct. If this happens, you must take action. The director’s contract may be suspended or terminated. Directors must prevent misconduct. This duty includes preventing misconduct and taking action if it occurs. Suspend or terminate the director’s employment contract. Misconduct can harm a company if unchecked. It can damage a company’s reputation, finances, and viability. Directors have many duties, not just preventing misconduct. They must also run the company fairly, transparently, and in the shareholders’ best interests. This includes ensuring the company’s finances are in order and operations are legal and compliant with regulations.

Obligations of a director in relation to the company

There are various ways in which directors can breach their duties and obligations as fiduciaries. Neglecting responsibilities, engaging in dishonest activities or failing to act fairly can have serious consequences for the company. If you are a director and notice any such misconduct, it is your responsibility to take action. This could involve telling the board of directors, asking for his/her resignation, or filing a lawsuit if necessary. Directors who violate their duties may be liable for damages suffered by the company as a result of their actions.

Duties of a director in respect of breaches by employees

As a company director, you must ensure employees follow the law and company policies. If an employee breaches their duties, you can suspend, fire, or report the incident.

Penalties for breach of duties by directors

It’s important to know the penalties that can be imposed on directors if they don’t uphold their duties and responsibilities. Here are some of the most common ones: – Removal from office – Restriction on activities – Loss of shareholding

Proof of the directors’ misconduct

When a director commits misconduct, it can have serious consequences for the company. To prove this, evidence of their cheating will be needed. This can be found through records of their business dealings or financial statements. However, the most important evidence of their misconduct is their own words. This is where witness testimonies and emails can be very helpful. By understanding their actions and motives, it will be easier to hold them accountable for their actions.

Circumstantial evidence

Consider circumstantial evidence when deciding whether to sue a former employer. This includes any information that demonstrates negligence on the part of the company, such as:

Failure to adhere to contract agreements

Gross mismanagement and neglect of duties

Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information

Failing to take necessary measures for safeguarding assets

Admissions by the director

There are a few points that need to be taken into account when it comes to directors’ misconduct. Section 166(5) of the Companies Act allows shareholders to sue wrongdoers for damages. This remedy is available even if the director has already resigned or been removed from office. Furthermore, proof of a director’s misconduct can be established through any means – witness testimonies, documentary evidence etcetera. If done voluntarily and without coercion, admitting guilt is usually enough (e.g., management). These provisions give shareholders legal tools to protect themselves and seek redress for director-caused losses.

Proceedings against a director

If you are a director and you know your colleague has committed misconduct, it is your moral duty to report it to the board. If you do not report the misconduct, you could be liable for damages as a result. The board of directors may take various actions against the director if they have committed misconduct – from suspending their membership rights to taking any other legal action deemed necessary. There are various methods through which misconduct can be proved, such as documentary evidence or witness statements. However, whatever steps need to be taken in order to punish and/or prevent future offences must always follow due process and comply with applicable laws.

Defences available to the directors

If you are a company’s director and discover misconduct, you have several defences. You can say you didn’t know about the misconduct or that it wasn’t your fault. You can also argue that the misconduct had no material effect on company affairs. Last but not least, as long as the offence does not amount to criminal mismanagement under Section 166(5) of The Companies Act, you may be immune from prosecution.

The director is liable for committing mismanagement

If you’re the director of a company and you believe that a breach of duty has occurred, it’s important that you take action. This includes anything from gross negligence to intentional wrongdoing. If you cause any loss or damage to the company as a result of this, you are liable for it. Speak with an attorney right away to see what options are available to you.

What is mismanagement?

When a director commits mismanagement, it can have serious consequences for the company. This includes anything that leads to financial losses – neglect of duty, wrongful gains etcetera. In order to establish liability, the court must be satisfied that there was a causal link between the misconduct and said financial loss.

Factors to be considered while taking such action

Certain elements must be addressed when taking action against a director found guilty of misbehaviour. These could include the type and severity of the wrongdoing, its impact on employees and customers, and efforts to defend the company’s interests. If you decide to take such activities yourself instead of reporting it to the police or filing for a restraining order/preliminary injunction, consult an attorney first to avoid legal errors.

Who can bring an accusation against the director?

Anyone who suffers a loss as a result of the misconduct of the director can bring an accusation against him. This includes people who were not directly harmed, but whose livelihoods or businesses were adversely affected by what happened. The accuser does not have to be the victim of the mismanagement. In order to make an accusation, he/she just has to act within six months after discovering that there was misconduct involved. And even if you’re miles away from where all this confusion and mayhem is taking place, you are still allowed to file an accusation – as long as it’s done in good faith and within legal boundaries. Needless to say, directors will always be liable for any wrongdoings even if they didn’t participate in them or had no idea about them going on behind their backs!

When must a director take corrective action?

When it comes to taking corrective action as a director, there are certain factors that need to be considered. The seriousness of the harm, whether it was foreseeable, and whether the director took any steps towards preventing or mitigating the damage can all play a role in holding them liable. On top of this, the burden of proof lies with the accused – they must show that they have taken all reasonable steps in order not only to prevent but also rectify any damage caused by their misconduct. In case a director willfully commits mismanagement by failing to take corrective action when aware of the breach(s) of duty, they may be held liable for financial compensation as well.

Damages that may be awarded to the company if the director is found liable

If the director of a company is found liable for mismanaging the business, this may result in significant losses for that company. Such damages can include lost profits and any other financial damage incurred as a direct consequence of the mismanagement. This includes situations where key decisions were made without proper consideration or research, resulting in detrimental consequences for the company’s operations. In such cases, it may be difficult to prove who was at fault – but if successful, directors can expect to be rewarded handsomely with compensation for their negligence!

Who is the prosecutor in the action against a director?

When it comes to taking action against a director for misconduct, the company itself is the prosecutor. This means that the prosecutor must take steps to ensure that the company’s interests are protected, including by taking appropriate legal action. Depending on the severity of the director’s misconduct, the prosecutor may appoint a receiver or liquidator to protect shareholders’ interests. Directors who engage in misconduct can face serious consequences – including dismissal from their positions and criminal prosecution. So, be sure to report any misconduct to the company’s board as soon as possible so that the interests of the company are protected and the director is held accountable.

Who can commence an action against a director?

If you are involved in any misconduct and believe that someone else may commence an action against you, it is important to speak to a lawyer as soon as possible. By law, the prosecutor in such an action is usually the company or its representative. This means that they will be handling all legal proceedings from start to finish – something which would not be ideal for you given your current situation.

How do prosecutors determine whether to prosecute a director?

When a prosecutor decides to prosecute a director, they will file an affidavit setting out the evidence against them and serve it on the director. The defence then has the opportunity to dispute these allegations in court. Ultimately, it is up to prosecutors who decide whether or not to bring a director criminally to book – taking into account factors like the seriousness of the breach, other potential victims, and any possible deterrent effect that prosecutions may have.

When must the prosecutor initiate an action?

When it comes to taking action against directors for misconduct, the prosecutor must weigh up all relevant factors. This includes investigating whether there is enough evidence to support an allegation of misconduct and deciding if a breach of duties has taken place. If so, he will initiate an action. The prosecutor does not need to wait for a complaint from another party before doing so – he can take unilateral steps in such cases.

What are the consequences of commencing an action against a director in violation of Section 166(5)?

If you believe that a director has committed misconduct, it is important to consult with a professional. This person can help guide you through the process and make sure that your actions are taken in the most appropriate way possible. It is also advisable to contact the prosecutor who will take an action against the director on behalf of the Board of Directors. Such an action could result in imprisonment or heavy fines – so be prepared for anything!

What happens if the prosecutor decides not to prosecute the director?

If the review is successful, the director will be removed from office and any benefits they may have accrued during that time will be revoked. The company can then take the matter to court and ask for a judicial review of the decision. If the prosecutor decides not to prosecute, they must give written reasons for their decision.

What are the consequences of a director’s breach of duties?

When a director breaches their duties under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act, they can face a range of consequences. This can include financial penalties, loss of voting rights, and even criminal charges. It’s important for directors to be aware of their responsibilities and take action if they believe someone has committed misconduct. In some cases, it may even result in the removal or suspension of the director’s right to vote and hold office. So, if you’re ever unsure about what to do in a situation, reach out to an attorney or your company’s internal legal team for guidance.

Directors’ discretionary liabilities

Directors must exercise reasonable care and diligence when carrying out their duties, in order to ensure that the company is run smoothly and efficiently. They cannot delegate important responsibilities to someone else without proper authority, nor can they act with reckless disregard for their obligations. In addition to personal liability, directors are also personally liable for any negligent or wrongful acts they commit while carrying out their job responsibilities. Directors have three months within which they must take appropriate action in response to misconduct – failing to do so could lead them to be held liable for damages caused by the company’s mishandling of affairs.

Director’s personal liability

Director’s personal liability is a serious issue that directors should be aware of. It can have far-reaching consequences for your business, and in some cases, the director himself can end up being held liable. breaching his duty may lead to monetary loss or damage caused by the company, as well as disqualification from acting as a director or imprisonment. These penalties come with strict rules and regulations that must be followed carefully if you want to avoid them happening to you.

Directors’ fixed liabilities

Directors are personally liable for any financial losses that may result from the breach of their duty under the Companies Act. This includes liabilities for damages caused by their wrongful act or omission in connection with their office. Directors can also be held liable for any financial losses that may result from a company’s bankruptcy, even if they were not involved in its management at the time of its collapse.

Procedure for commencing an action against a director

If you have evidence that a director has failed in their duties, it is important to take action. There are various remedies available, such as financial compensation and/or injunctions. The first step is to gather the relevant evidence so that an effective case can be made. After this, you should seek legal advice to ensure that your actions are justified and compliant with the company law.

Effect of a director’s breach on shareholders and the company itself

When a director violates his or her duties, it can have serious consequences for both shareholders and the company itself. For instance, in some cases, directors may be disqualified from holding office or performing their functions as directors of the company. This includes preventing them from voting on important matters, attending board meetings etc. In extreme cases, a director who commits misconduct may even be removed from office by the court altogether. Similarly, shareholders can sue a director for any loss or damage they cause to themselves (or to other shareholders). This could include financial compensation as well as damages such as lost profits or hurt feelings. The company itself might also face various negative consequences caused by this type of misconduct – such falls in share prices being common examples

The time period during which an action can be taken

There are certain rules that must be followed when taking action against a director who has done something wrong. The time period starts on the day the wrongdoing is found out and ends sixty days later. If, before any action is taken, it becomes clear that the director won’t stop their bad behaviour, the time limit for taking action will be extended by sixty days until the director stops what they’re doing. Also, action can be taken against a director who did something wrong six months before. So if you’re feeling frustrated with a director who has repeatedly violated company rules, don’t wait – take action now!

The Board may then appoint a person to act in place of the director, with or without conditions

If a director’s misconduct is noticed, the Board may appoint someone to act in his or her place. This person will have all of the same powers and duties as a director, except for those relating to incompatibility with the office (e.g., conflicts of interest). They are subject to all the same liabilities as directors do, with one exception – they cannot be sued for damages in relation to their official capacity.

The notice must be given to the Director and an opportunity given to make representations

When it comes to appointing or terminating a director, proper notice and an opportunity to make representations are essential. The termination should be made in as public a way as possible – for example, by publishing a statement on the company website. In order to take action against someone who has committed misconduct, ensure that you have sufficient evidence to back up your claims. This might include documentation of past misconduct or any statements made by the person accused which raise serious concerns about their suitability for office.

Section 166(5) of the Companies Act provides for a Director who commits misconduct to be removed from office

Section 166(5) of the Companies Act indicates a company’s board can fire a bad director if certain circumstances are met. A director can be sacked for any activity that hurts the company’s reputation. This involves professional misbehaviour, financial problems, and corporate management or administration issues. Within three months after learning of a director’s wrongdoing, the board must approve a resolution. Once this resolution passes, actions are followed to remove the person from office, which may have consequences.

The removal process is as follows:

If you have been told that a director is acting badly, you must follow the steps for getting rid of them. This will help avoid legal problems in the future and make sure that justice is done. The notice must be sent to the director, who has 21 days to respond. If they don’t respond, the Court will order their removal if they don’t. If you are allowed to file an appeal, the appeal will be heard by a single judge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens next once I have submitted a notice of contravention under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act?

If a company director doesn’t respond to a notice of contravention within 30 days, the regulator may find a breach of duties under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act. If this happens, then the director will be given an opportunity to respond. Once a response is received, the regulator will consider any remedial actions that may be taken, such as fines or imprisonment. It is always advisable to seek professional legal advice before taking any action pursuant to Sections 166 or 167 of the Companies Act.

What are the main grounds for action against a director who has committed misconduct?

There are several grounds for action against directors who have committed misconduct. If a director commits an illegal, harmful, or financially damaging act, they can be removed. Misbehaving directors may face suspension or removal from the board. Shareholders must first file a complaint with the board of directors alleging director misconduct. Once the board has received a complaint, it will then decide what, if any, action should be taken. This may include issuing a warning, reprimanding the director, or even terminating their employment. If the misconduct is severe enough, the board may also pursue legal action against the director.

Is there any way to appeal my decision to sanction a director under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act?

Section 166(5) of the Companies Act allows you to sanction a director for misconduct. This section provides a mechanism for companies to discipline their directors for breaking company rules. Appeal grounds include the appropriateness of the sanction, procedural errors, and bias or favouritism in the original decision. Regardless of the outcome of your case, you may want to consult with an attorney before taking action. There are many legal implications that can arise from bringing a complaint under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act.

How do I submit a notice of contravention under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act?

First, submit a notice of contravention if you suspect a director or officer of misconduct. This involves filing a formal complaint with the regulator (usually the Companies Registrar or the Corporate Affairs Commission). After submitting your notice, gather evidence to support your claims. This includes emails, texts, memos, and other documents. It depends on the company’s misconduct and other legal grounds (such as breach of contract). After submitting your notice, wait for the company’s response (they usually do). Depending on the complexity of the case, the company’s response is usually filed within 30 days. After receiving the company’s response, draught a final response and file it with the appropriate authority. The next step is up to them. Notice of contravention is a

Can anything stop me from taking any legal or other action against a director who has committed misconduct?

Finally, preserve evidence of your misconduct claims. By saving emails, documents, and other materials, you can use them in legal proceedings or disciplinary action against the director. Section 166(5) of the Companies Act allows all directors to remove a director for misconduct. You may be able to convince the other directors to remove the director if you don’t have enough votes. If you want to sue a director for misconduct, you must have solid evidence. Before taking any action, get legal advice to protect yourself from risks and legal costs.

What are the steps that I need to take in order to take action against a director who has committed misconduct?

To take action against a director for misconduct, first, investigate and gather evidence. After establishing misconduct, you must determine which section of the Companies Act applies. This depends on the type of misconduct and legal consequences. Finally, you will need to take steps towards taking action against the director in accordance with applicable law. This may involve filing a complaint with authorities or suspending or terminating their membership in your company.

What are the different types of actions that I can take under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act?

Section 166(5) of the Companies Act allows for the following actions to be taken against a director who has breached their duties:

    1. Proceedings for damages: If a director breaches their duties and causes damage to a company, they may be liable to pay damages to the company.
    2. Action under Section 166(5) of the Companies Act can include any of the following: – Proceedings for an injunction: A director who breaches their duties may also be subject to an injunction prohibiting them from engaging in specified activities with respect to the company.
    3. Proceedings for damages – If a director breaches their duties and causes damage to a company, they may be liable to pay damages to the company.
  • Proceedings for an injunction – A director who breaches their duties may also be subject to an injunction prohibiting them from engaging in specified activities with respect to the company.

When should I contact my attorney before taking any action against a director?

If you have concerns or allegations against a company director, consult an attorney first. An attorney can advise you on how to proceed and explain the possible consequences. Furthermore, if you have evidence that a director has committed misconduct, contacting an attorney is a prudent step to consider. Attorneys can record what you say to the director in case you need to prove it later.


A company may take action against a director who breaches Section 166(5) of the Companies Act. In this blog, we outline possible actions and their prerequisites. Make sure to read through this blog to understand your rights and responsibilities as a director.

Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this blog post is for general information and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog post should be construed as legal advice from The Aran Law Firm or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter.

Tags :
Legal Knowledge

Share This:

Legal Updates